Isaac v. Brown et al
| Abdul Rashid Isaac |
| Dennis Brown and Thurbert E Baker |
| 5:2010cv00252 |
| June 29, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Macon Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| C. Ashley Royal |
| Claude W. Hicks |
| Habeas Corpus: General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER denying 82 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 4/5/17 (lap)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER adopting 35 Report and Recommendations. Petitioner's 28 USC Section 2254 petition seeking habeas corpus relief is hereby STAYED and HELD IN ABEYANCE, pending further order of the Court. Petitioner is hereby ORDERED to file within thirty (30) days after state court exhaustion is completed, a motion to lift the stay.Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 10/23/12 (lap)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 16 Report and Recommendations and granting 11 Motion to Dismiss. Furthermore, as also set forth in the Recommendation, a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 5/20/11 (lap)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 3 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge William T. Moore on 06/28/2010. (lmm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
