Wright v. Langford et al
Plaintiff: Willie Frank Wright, Jr
Defendant: Officer Langford, Jammie Hargroven and Therone Harrison
Case Number: 5:2010cv00272
Filed: July 19, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Macon Office
County: Baldwin
Presiding Judge: C. Ashley Royal
Presiding Judge: Claude W. Hicks
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER denying 89 Motion for Recusal and denying 90 Request for a hearing. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 10/23/12 (lap)
October 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER denying 82 Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 10/11/12 (lap)
October 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER denying 78 Motion to Obtain Transcripts. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 10/5/12 (lap)
August 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 65 Motion in Limine. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 8/7/12 (lap)
July 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER denying 58 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting in part and denying in part 59 Motion to Reopen Time to File Appeal. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 7/20/12 (lap)
March 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER adopting 44 Report and Recommendations and granting 26 Motion for Summary Judgment.Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 3/29/12 (lap)
November 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER denying 39 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Ordered by U.S. Mag. Judge Charles H. Weigle on 11/10/11. (mgb)
September 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER adopting 36 Report and Recommendations and denying 18 Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 9/30/2011 (lap)
September 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 4 Report and Recommendations. Defendant Hargroven is hereby DISMISSED as a party to this action. The claims against Defendants Wright and Harrison may proceed.Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 9/14/2010 (lap)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. Langford et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willie Frank Wright, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer Langford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jammie Hargroven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Therone Harrison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?