Harris v. Southern Health Partners Inc et al
| Subrina Harris |
| Tiffany Sumler, Southern Health Partners Inc, S. C. Anderson, Valerie Brown, Lily Green, S. Henderson, Angela Jackson, Susan Kaplan, Miranda Mertons, Debra Owens and Natasha Staten-Smith |
| 5:2011cv00022 |
| January 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Macon Office |
| Houston |
| Marc Thomas Treadwell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 54 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 57 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 59 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 60 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 61 Motion for P artial Summary Judgment; denying 62 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 63 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 64 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 65 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 66 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 67 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Defendants Angela Jackson, Valerie Brown, Beth Kaplan, and Tiffany Sumler are DISMISSED as parties to this action. The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to enter final judgment in favor of Defendants Jackson, Brown, Kaplan, and Sumler. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 5/29/13 (lap)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
