Thomas v. Billue et al
| Ryan Patric Thomas |
| Alfred Weems, Michael McCord, Wilbert Hartsfeild, George Ball, Carter Ketchup, Donald Williams and Curtis Billue |
| 5:2011cv00094 |
| March 10, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Macon Office |
| Baker |
| W. Louis Sands |
| Charles H Weigle |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
117
ORDER granting 78 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 79 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 81 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 82 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 83 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 84 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 85 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 86 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting in part Report and Recommendations re 106 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Billue and Ball remain. Case will be noticed for trial during the Court's next regular trial term.Ordered by Judge W. Louis Sands on 09/17/12 (cma)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER VACATING Text Only Order on Motion to Strike entered on October 18, 2011 and GRANTING 19 MOTION to Strike to the limited extent that it seeks to strike 15 RESPONSE in Opposition. Ordered by U.S. Mag. Judge Charles H. Weigle on 10/27/2011. (mgb)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER denying 64 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Ordered by U.S. Mag. Judge Charles H. Weigle on 9/22/11.(mgb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
