The Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Tommy L Griffin Plumbing and Heating Company et al
The Cincinnati Insurance Company |
Tommy L Griffin, Jr, Tommy L Griffin Plumbing and Heating Company, Tommy L Griffin, Sr and Lois S Griffin |
5:2011cv00166 |
May 2, 2011 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
Macon Office |
Bibb |
Marc Thomas Treadwell |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 ORDER GRANTING 33 Joint Motion to Substitute Sandra Lawson. Sandra Lawson, as the "legal representative" of Lois S. Griffin, is substituted as Defendant in this present action in the place of Lois S. Griffin, who previously served as De fendant both individually and in her capacity as Executrix of the Estate of Tommy L. Griffin, Sr. The Judgment entered in favor of Cincinnati on October 11, 2012 32 is effective as to Lawson, as a Defendant and in her capacity as Executrix of the Estate of Tommy L. Griffin, Sr. and Lois S. Griffin. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 5/14/2013. (tlh) |
Filing 31 ORDER GRANTING 30 Motion for Summary Judgment as to defendants Tommy L. Griffin Plumbing and Heating Co. and Sandra Lawson, in her capacity as the executor of the Estate of Lois S. Griffin and as the executor of the Estate of Tommy L. Griffin, Sr. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 10/5/2012. (tlh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.