HICKORY GROVE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH v. CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff: HICKORY GROVE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH INC
Defendant: CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Case Number: 5:2011cv00407
Filed: October 11, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Macon Office
County: Hancock
Presiding Judge: C. Ashley Royal
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by U.S. District Judge C ASHLEY ROYAL on 3/21/14 (lap)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HICKORY GROVE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH v. CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HICKORY GROVE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH INC
Represented By: JAMES F NELSON, JR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHURCH MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: Peter H. Schmidt, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?