GREGORY v. PREFERRED FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS et al
| TINA M GREGORY |
| PREFERRED FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, CREDIT CARD RELIEF, THOMAS P DAKICH and RHONDA ROELL-TAYLOR |
| 5:2011cv00422 |
| October 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Macon Office |
| Putnam |
| Marc Thomas Treadwell |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
150
FINAL ORDER OF JUDGMENT AND DISMISSAL. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 3/21/2019. (kat)
|
|
Filing
131
ORDER GRANTING 118 Motion for Summary Judgment and DENYING as moot 129 Motion to delay the stay. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 5/15/2014. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER GRANTING 114 Motion to Strike. The Defendants are ORDERED to respond to 115 the Plaintiffs motion to compel by NOON on March 11, 2014. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 3/10/2014. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 97 Amended Motion to Certify Class and DENYING as moot 66 Motion to Certify Class. Any party objecting to the interim counsels appointment as class counsel shall have 7 days from the date of entry of this Order certifying the class to file written objections with the Court. The Court designates named Plaintiff Tina M. Gregory as class representative. Within 7 days from the date of this Order, the Parties shall file a joint proposal for providing notice to class members. Ordered by U.S. District Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 12/17/2013. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER DENYING 78 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; GRANTING 79 Motion for More Definite Statement; DENYING AS MOOT 70 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; and DENYING AS MOOT 71 Motion for More Definite Statement. Althou gh the Plaintiffs have alleged theories of piercing the corporate veil, alter ego, and joint venture, their allegations do not apprise the Preferred Defendants of which Defendant is alleged to have committed which act. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs sh all file an amended complaint no later than December 9, 2013 that puts the individual and corporate Defendants on notice as to which wrongful acts are alleged to have been committed by each Defendant to the extent possible. If the Moving Defendants continue to believe that they are not subject to the Court's personal jurisdiction or that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law, then they may renew their motion to dismiss or move for summary judgment within 30 days of the filing of the amended complaint. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 10/21/2013. (tlh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
