Ward v. Chapman
Petitioner: Todd L. Ward
Respondent: Tom Chapman
Case Number: 5:2012cv00008
Filed: January 5, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Macon Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: C. Ashley Royal
Presiding Judge: Charles H Weigle
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER adopting 13 Report and Recommendations and granting 9 Motion to Dismiss. A certificate of appealability is Denied. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 12/13/12 (lap)
March 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER for Response to 9 MOTION to Dismiss Petition As Untimely filed by Tom Chapman. Ordered by U.S. Mag. Judge Charles H. Weigle on 3/22/12. (mgb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ward v. Chapman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Tom Chapman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Todd L. Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?