BROOKS v. HUMPHREY et al
FRED DALTON BROOKS |
CARL HUMPHREY, POWELL, BISHOP and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES |
5:2012cv00281 |
July 16, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
Macon Office |
Butts |
C. Ashley Royal |
Charles H Weigle |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 127 ORDER adopting 110 Report and Recommendations; granting 86 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying as futile 95 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 9/30/16 (lap) |
Filing 54 ORDER adopting 45 Report and Recommendations and granting 33 Motion to Dismiss; granting 39 Motion to Dismiss; denying as moot 48 Motions for Emergency Injunction; denying as moot 50 Motion for Hearing; terminating as moot 17 Motion to Dismiss Complaint. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 9/5/13 (lap) |
Filing 22 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion for Reconsideration (Exceptions to the Magistrate's Order) ; finding as moot 16 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff is hereby DIRECTED to file an Amended Complaint in accordance with this Order within TWENTYONE (21) DAYS of the date of this Order.Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 11/19/12 (lap) |
Filing 20 ORDER adopting 7 Report and Recommendations. John and Jane Doe are hereby DISMISSED from this action. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 11/16/12 (lap) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.