WYNN v. NEILSON et al
BOBBY LEON WYNN |
CHIEF JAILER NEILSON, Captain SCARBURY and BIBB COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER |
5:2012cv00320 |
August 7, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
Macon Office |
Bibb |
MARC THOMAS TREADWELL |
CHARLES H WEIGLE |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Letter from Plaintiff regarding immediate release (ans) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Inmate Grievance Form by BOBBY LEON WYNN (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ans) |
Filing 9 JUDGMENT (cal) |
![]() |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Inmate Grievance Form by BOBBY LEON WYNN (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Inmate Handbook, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(ans) |
Filing 6 EXHIBIT(S) by BOBBY LEON WYNN re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(ans) |
Filing 5 Letter from petitioner regarding request for status of case - mailed petitioner a copy of docket sheet (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ans) |
Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to BOBBY LEON WYNN (cal) |
![]() |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by BOBBY LEON WYNN (Attachments: #1 Note in re: completion of IFP). Motion(s) referred to Charles H Weigle.(cal) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus,filed by BOBBY LEON WYNN. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Exhibit 1)(cal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.