CORZINE v. LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INCORPORATED
Plaintiff: KRISTINE CORZINE
Defendant: LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INCORPORATED
Case Number: 5:2012cv00405
Filed: October 10, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Macon Office
County: Houston
Presiding Judge: C. Ashley Royal
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER granting 18 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by U.S. District Judge C ASHLEY ROYAL on 3/21/14 (lap)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CORZINE v. LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INCORPORATED
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KRISTINE CORZINE
Represented By: THOMAS F RICHARDSON
Represented By: James Pope Langstaff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL INCORPORATED
Represented By: Frank L. Butler, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?