HART CARE NRC LLC v. FREDERICA ACRES INC

Defendant: FREDERICA ACRES INC
Plaintiff: HART CARE NRC LLC
Case Number: 5:2013cv00109
Filed: March 26, 2013
Court: Georgia Middle District Court
Office: Macon Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: C. Ashley Royal
Nature of Suit: Rent Lease & Ejectment
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 10, 2013 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The parties must file their proposed scheduling and discovery order within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Ordered by U.S. District Judge C. Ashley Royal on 12/10/13 (lap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HART CARE NRC LLC v. FREDERICA ACRES INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FREDERICA ACRES INC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HART CARE NRC LLC
Represented By: JAMES WILLIAM PURCELL
Represented By: Michael N Loebl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.