NATIONAL REIMBURSEMENT GROUP INC v. GEMINI INSURANCE COMPANY

Plaintiff: NATIONAL REIMBURSEMENT GROUP INC
Defendant: GEMINI INSURANCE COMPANY
Case Number: 5:2013cv00145
Filed: April 19, 2013
Court: Georgia Middle District Court
Office: Macon Office
County: Bibb
Presiding Judge: Marc Thomas Treadwell
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 21, 2013 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING 4 Motion to Dismiss. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 8/21/2013. (tlh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NATIONAL REIMBURSEMENT GROUP INC v. GEMINI INSURANCE COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NATIONAL REIMBURSEMENT GROUP INC
Represented By: Duke R. Groover
Represented By: Gordon Grant Greenwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEMINI INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: Jonathan Jay Kandel
Represented By: PHILIP W SAVRIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.