BOWEN v. HUMPHREY et al
Plaintiff: WALKER D BOWEN
Defendant: CARL HUMPHREY, DOUG UNDERWOOD, ANTHONY BROOKINS, CAGER EDWARD DAVIS and BRUCE REX SCHOOLCRAFT
Case Number: 5:2013cv00256
Filed: July 19, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Macon Office
County: Butts
Presiding Judge: Marc Thomas Treadwell
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 169 ORDER DENYING 129 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 7/27/2016. (tlh)
March 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 162 ORDER DENYING as moot 106 Motion to Strike. Defendant's motion for sanctions is also DENIED. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 3/16/2016. (tlh)
February 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER GRANTING 94 Motion for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b). Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 2/25/2015. (tlh)
February 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER GRANTING 86 Motion to Dismiss. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 2/17/2015. (tlh)
August 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER DENYING as moot 42 Motion to Quash/Protective Order; DENYING as moot 53 Motion to Dismiss; and GRANTING 81 Motion to Stay Discovery. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 8/22/2014. (tlh)
July 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER DENYING 52 Dr. Schoolcraft's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 7/16/2014. (tlh)
June 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER GRANTING 72 Motion to Produce Merkerson Medical Records; GRANTING 73 Motion to have Merkerson Medical Records Made Part of the Record. the state Defendants shall produce to the Plaintiff Merkerson's mental health records for 2010. The Plaintiff may depose the state Defendants as well as Stephen Sloan, Ph.D., the individual who completed and signed a mental health evaluation form for Merkerson that is dated March 9, 2010. The scope of these depositions will be strictly limit ed to the events occurring at Baldwin State Prison. The Plaintiff shall not inquire about policies and procedures or similar matters. The sole purpose of the depositions will be to determine whether the state Defendants had knowledge of facts that would suggest they were subjectively aware of a substantial risk of serious harm to Mr. Bowen. Although the Court will not set a time limit for the depositions, the Court would expect that each deposition would take no more than 30 minutes. Finally, barring unforeseen circumstances, the Court expects the Parties can complete this limited discovery within 60 days of this Order. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 6/6/2014. (tlh)
February 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER GRANTING 46 Motion to Withdraw Document; GRANTING 48 Motion for Leave to File; DENYING as moot 11 Motion to Dismiss; DENYING as moot 14 Motion to Dismiss Complaint. The Plaintiff is instructed to promptly file as his amended compla int the exhibit [48-1] attached to his motion. Upon the filing of the Plaintiff's amended complaint, the Defendants may file a responsive motion or pleading within the time provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 2/3/2014. (tlh)
October 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER DENYING 12 Motion to Stay by Defendants Brookins, Davis, Humphrey and Underwood and DENYING 15 Motion to Stay by Defendant Schoolcraft. Ordered by Judge Marc Thomas Treadwell on 10/21/2013. (tlh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BOWEN v. HUMPHREY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WALKER D BOWEN
Represented By: GARY PAUL BUNCH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CARL HUMPHREY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOUG UNDERWOOD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANTHONY BROOKINS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CAGER EDWARD DAVIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRUCE REX SCHOOLCRAFT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?