CLYATT v. MIDDLE GEORGIA RESA
Plaintiff: ZEESTER CLYATT
Defendant: MIDDLE GEORGIA RESA
Case Number: 5:2013cv00324
Filed: September 5, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Macon Office
County: Bibb
Presiding Judge: C. Ashley Royal
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER denying 29 Motion to Amend; granting 30 Motion to Dismiss; terminating as moot 40 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Ordered by U.S. District Judge C ASHLEY ROYAL on 8/15/14 (lap)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CLYATT v. MIDDLE GEORGIA RESA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MIDDLE GEORGIA RESA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ZEESTER CLYATT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?