CHAUNCEY v. GILLS et al
WILLIAM M CHAUNCEY |
GILLS, CALDWELL and BRIAN OWENS |
5:2014cv00133 |
April 7, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
Macon Office |
Bibb |
STEPHEN HYLES |
C ASHLEY ROYAL |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 ORDER denying 36 Motion to Compel; denying 38 Motion to Compel. The parties are directed to confer regarding the issues raised in Plaintiff's motions and respond to the Court as detailed herein within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Ordered by US Magistrate Judge STEPHEN HYLES on 4-2-15 (mpm) |
Filing 23 ORDER dismissing as moot 19 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint filed by WILLIAM M CHAUNCEY, granting in part 22 MOTION to Amend/Correct 1 Complaint filed by WILLIAM M CHAUNCEY, denying 21 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by WILLIAM M CHAUNCEY. ORDER Directing Service re 1 Complaint filed by WILLIAM M CHAUNCEY, 22 MOTION to Amend/Correct. The Clerk is directed to add Officer Haire as a Defendant in this case. The USMS is directed to serve Defendant Haire at Wilcox State Prison. Ordered by US Magistrate Judge STEPHEN HYLES on 11-17-14. (mpm) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying 5 Motion for Information. Plaintiff is ordered to pay the initial partial filing fee of $5.51 within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Ordered by US Magistrate Judge STEPHEN HYLES on 4-29-14 (mpm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.