UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FIFTH THIRD MORTGAGE COMPANY et al
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
FIFTH THIRD MORTGAGE COMPANY, MICHAEL AYOUB, CRANBROOK MORTGAGE CORPORATION and CRANBROOK MORTGAGE CORPORATION doing business as CRANBROOK LOANS |
5:2014cv00292 |
August 7, 2014 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
Macon Office |
Bibb |
MARC THOMAS TREADWELL |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 DISBURSEMENT ORDER. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 3/29/2016. (tlh) |
Filing 3 JOINT MOTION for Entry of Disbursement Order by FIFTH THIRD MORTGAGE COMPANY filed by ANDREA K MITCHELL. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(MITCHELL, ANDREA) |
REMARK: Attorney Andrew L. Sandler admitted pro hac vice on behalf of Fifth Third Mortgage Company. (nop) |
REMARK: Attorney Andrea Mitchell admitted pro hac vice on behalf of Fifth Third Mortgage Company. (nop) |
Filing 2 CONSENT ORDER. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 8/11/2014. (tlh) |
REMARK: Email sent to Attorneys Andrew L. Sandler and Andrea K. Mitchell regarding the Court's admission requirements. (nop) ). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants,filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment to Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Consent Order)(cal) Modified on 8/8/2014 (cma). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.