POTTER v. DOOLY COUNTY GEORGIA et al
Plaintiff: LORIE POTTER
Defendant: DOOLY COUNTY GEORGIA, DON WILLIFORD and LUCIUS VAN PEAVY
Case Number: 5:2014cv00315
Filed: September 2, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Macon Office
County: Dooly
Presiding Judge: MARC THOMAS TREADWELL
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER DENYING 66 Motion for Leave to Appeal. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 11/29/2016. (tlh)
August 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 58 Motion for Reconsideration. Potter's motion for reconsideration is GRANTED in part with respect to the First Amendment retaliation claim against the Estate o f Sheriff Peavy and DENIED in part with respect to the First Amendment retaliation claim against Williford and Dooly County. For the reasons discussed in this order, the Estate's motion for summary judgment is DENIED with respect to the federal First Amendment retaliation claim and the state-law claim for violations of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the State of Georgia, DENIED with respect to a state-law claim for tortious interference with business relations, and GRANTED with respect to Potter's claims for punitive damages. Potter's motion to enter partial final judgment is DENIED as moot. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 8/2/2016. (tlh)
April 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 37 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 4/26/2016. (tlh)
March 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER DENYING as moot 21 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; DENYING as moot 22 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 3/30/2016. (tlh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: POTTER v. DOOLY COUNTY GEORGIA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LORIE POTTER
Represented By: ELEANOR M ATTWOOD
Represented By: PAULDING CHICHESTER, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOOLY COUNTY GEORGIA
Represented By: Kimberly A. Reid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DON WILLIFORD
Represented By: Kimberly A. Reid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LUCIUS VAN PEAVY
Represented By: Kimberly A. Reid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?