STINSKI v. CHATMAN et al
Plaintiff: DARRYL SCOTT STINSKI
Defendant: BRUCE CHATMAN, KEITH EUTSEY, MILLER, STANLEY HARRELL and BAUCOMB
Case Number: 5:2014cv00409
Filed: November 24, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Macon Office
County: Butts
Presiding Judge: MARC THOMAS TREADWELL
Presiding Judge: CHARLES H WEIGLE
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER ADOPTING as modified 24 Report and Recommendations; DENYING 21 Motion for Legal Supplies; and GRANTING 18 Motion to Dismiss. The religious freedom claims regarding the denial of religious items an d observances and the equal protection claims against Defendants Chatman and Miller are DISMISSED. The religious freedom claims against Defendants Miller, Eutsey, Baucomb, Harrell, and Pierly; the equal protection claim against Defendant Harrell; and the retaliation claims against Defendants Chatman, Miller, and Eutsey remain. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 1/4/2016. (tlh)
September 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER GRANTING 7 Motion for Reconsideration and ADOPTING in part and REJECTING in part 13 Report and Recommendations. The Court VACATES its dismissal of the Plaintiff's claims against the Defendants. It is therefore ORDERED that service be made on Defendants Chatman, Miller, Eutsey, Baucomb, Harrell, and Pierly and that they file an answer or such other response as may be appropriate under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 9/24/2015. (tlh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: STINSKI v. CHATMAN et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DARRYL SCOTT STINSKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRUCE CHATMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KEITH EUTSEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MILLER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STANLEY HARRELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BAUCOMB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?