MORROW et al v. ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY et al
| BARBARA MORROW and BENNY MORROW |
| ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, ALLSTATE FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 5:2016cv00137 |
| April 14, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Macon Office |
| Cook |
| C ASHLEY ROYAL |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
ORDER denying 82 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 83 Motion for Hearing. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE HUGH LAWSON on 5/22/2020. (aks)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER denying 52 Motion to Certify Class. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE HUGH LAWSON on 4/7/2020. (aks)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER denying 22 Motion to Dismiss Complaint. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE HUGH LAWSON on 8/15/2017. (aks)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion to Dismiss Complaint. The Court dismisses Count 3 of the Complaint. To the extent Plaintiffs wish to pursue relief under Counts 1 and 2 of the Complaint for foundational and/or structural support damage incurred in 2010, the Court will permit Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint. Any amendment must be filed on or before April 19, 2017. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE HUGH LAWSON on 3/29/2017. (aks)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
