CRAWFORD v. PRUITTHEALTH PEAKE LLC
Plaintiff: ANGELA CRAWFORD
Defendant: PRUITTHEALTH PEAKE LLC
Case Number: 5:2016cv00157
Filed: April 27, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Macon Office
County: Bibb
Presiding Judge: C ASHLEY ROYAL
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING 4 Motion to Compel Arbitration. In addition, because all issues raised in Plaintiffs Complaint must be submitted to arbitration, this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE C ASHLEY ROYAL on 7/15/2016. (tlh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CRAWFORD v. PRUITTHEALTH PEAKE LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANGELA CRAWFORD
Represented By: TREMAIN C MATTRESS
Represented By: REGINA S MOLDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PRUITTHEALTH PEAKE LLC
Represented By: GARY BLAYLOCK ANDREWS, JR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?