BEARDEN v. E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Plaintiff: JAMES W BEARDEN
Defendant: E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Case Number: 5:2016cv00158
Filed: April 28, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Macon Office
County: Lowndes
Presiding Judge: LESLIE J ABRAMS
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER denying 43 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 51 Motion to Strike; and granting 44 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE TILMAN E SELF, III on 9/26/2018. (chc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BEARDEN v. E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMES W BEARDEN
Represented By: DOUGLAS RICHARD KERTSCHER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Represented By: JUSTIN R BARNES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?