WHITEHEAD v. CRICKMAR

Petitioner: REGGIE WHITEHEAD
Respondent: SCOTT CRICKMAR
Case Number: 5:2016cv00166
Filed: May 6, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Office: Macon Office
County: Pulaski
Presiding Judge: MARC THOMAS TREADWELL
Presiding Judge: CHARLES H WEIGLE
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2017 Filing 17 ORDER ADOPTING 16 Report and Recommendations and GRANTING 12 Motion to Dismiss. COA is DENIED. Any motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is therefore also DENIED. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 1/12/2017. (tlh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WHITEHEAD v. CRICKMAR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: REGGIE WHITEHEAD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SCOTT CRICKMAR
Represented By: JASON MATTHEW REA
Represented By: PAULA K SMITH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?