WALKER v. ALDI FOOD MARKET INC et al
| TRACY LATRICE WALKER |
| ALDI FOOD MARKET INC, DEBORAH SHUPE and MOLLY HAMMOND |
| 5:2017cv00003 |
| January 3, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Macon Office |
| Baldwin |
| MARC THOMAS TREADWELL |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 12/27/2018. (kat)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER: Walker's claims against Defendants Shupe and Hammons are DISMISSED without prejudice. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 11/28/2017. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER:The Plaintiff's claims of race discrimination against the Defendants are allowed to proceed. But her sex discrimination claims against the Defendants are DISMISSED. To the extent Plaintiff attempts to allege any other claims in her amended complaint, those claims are DISMISSED so that only her allegation of race discrimination remains. The Court ORDERS service on the Defendants by the United States Marshal Service. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 5/15/2017. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER: The Plaintiff is ordered to file an amended complaint complying with these requirements within 14 days of receipt of this Order. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 4/13/2017. (tlh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
