RODRIGUEZ v. BRYSON et al
| HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR |
| HOMER BRYSON, BRUCE CHATMAN, CELLARS, RODNEY MCCLOUD, JUNE BISHOP, WILLIAM POWELL, GARY CALDWELL, RUFUS LOGAN, FREDRICK SUTTON, MARTIN, JOHN/JANE DOES, SHARON LEWIS, EDWARD HALE BURNSIDE, BEARING, MARY GORE, LINDA ADAIR, DAVID BUTTS, HUNTER, CHRISTOPHER STOGHILL, WILLIAMS, KAREN FORTS, DARREL REID, MICKY WHITE, FINK and MAYE |
| 5:2017cv00010 |
| January 10, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Macon Office |
| Butts |
| MARC THOMAS TREADWELL |
| CHARLES H WEIGLE |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
242
ORDER DENYING 233 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis; and DENYING as moot 238 Motion for an Order requiring prison officials to produce Plaintiff's inmate account history. If Rodriguez wishe s to proceed with his appeal, he must pay the entire $505 appellate filing fee. Because Rodriguez has stated that he cannot pay the fee immediately, he must pay using the partial payment plan described under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to the custodian of the prison in which Rodriguez is incarcerated. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 5/13/2020. (kat)
|
|
Filing
213
ORDER DENYING 193 Motion to Appoint Medical Expert; and DENYING 200 Motion for Reconsideration of Motion to Appoint Medical Expert. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 1/27/2020. (kat)
|
|
Filing
207
ORDER GRANTING 188 Defendants' Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 12/17/2019. (kat)
|
|
Filing
194
ORDER DENYING 193 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 11/8/2019. (kat)
|
|
Filing
187
ORDER ADOPTING as modified 182 Report and Recommendations; and GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 175 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Parties MICHAEL CANNON (Warden and/or Superintendent of GDCP), KA REN FORTS (Counselor, GDCP), MARY GORE (Nurse, GDCP), HUNTER (GDOC), SHARON LEWIS (Medical Director, GDOC), RODNEY MCCLOUD (Telfair State Prison), DARREL REID (Counselor, GDCP), WILLIAMS (GDOC), LINDA ADAIR (Nurse, GDCP) and DAVID BUTTS (M edical Director, GDCP) are terminated. Defendants shall file a supplemental motion for summary judgment on the remaining equal protection claim within fourteen days. The Plaintiff shall file a response within fourteen days of service of that supplemental motion. The Defendants may file a reply brief within ten days of service of the Plaintiffs response.Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 9/6/2019. (kat)
|
|
Filing
155
ORDER REJECTING 136 Plaintiff's Objection to 129 ORDER denying 113 Motion to Amend/Correct and AFFIRMING 129 ORDER denying 113 Motion to Amend/Correct, and TERMINATING as moot 154 Motion request for District Court Review. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 7/18/2018. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
145
ORDER DENYING 140 Motion for TRO or Preliminary Injunction. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 6/7/2018. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER REJECTING 112 Objection filed by HJALMAR RODRIGUEZ, JR and AFFIRMING 106 Order. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 3/21/2018. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER ADOPTING in part and REJECTING as moot in part 14 Report and Recommendations; GRANTING 39 Motion to Amend/Correct; DENYING 11 Motion for TRO/Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The following claims are allowed to proceed for further factual development: (1) Religious freedom claims against Defendants Bryson, Sellers, Chatman, Caldwell, Sutton, Martin, Bishop, Powell, and McCloud; (2) Eighth Amendment claims regarding contaminated food against Defendants Sutton, Martin, Chatman, and Caldwell; (3) Eighth Amendment claims regarding nutritionally inadequate meals against Defendants Bryson, Sellers, Chatman, Caldwell, Sutton, and Martin; (4) Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to medical care claims regarding dental care against Defendants Adair, Gore, Burnside, Reid, Forts, Butts, Lewis, and Chatman; (5) Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to medical care claims regarding Rodriguezs shoulder injury against Defendants Burnside, Bishop, Powell, and Williams; and (6) the retaliation claims against Defendant Burnside. Additionally, the following claims are now also allowed to proceed for further factual development: (1) Religious freedom claims against Defendants Logan, Thorn ton, Cannon, Hunter, and Dozier; (2) Eighth Amendment claims regarding contaminated food against Defendants Thornton and Cannon; (3) Eight Amendment claims regarding nutritionally inadequate meals against Defendants Dozier, Logan, Thornton, McCloud, and Cannon; (4) Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to medical care claims regarding dental care against Defendants Dozier, Bryson, and Sellers; (5) Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to medical care claims regarding Rodriguezs shoulder in jury against Defendant Chatman; and (6) The equal protection claims against Defendants Bryson, Dozier, Sellers, Chatman, Caldwell, Thornton, Sutton, Martin, Bishop, Logan, and Powell. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that service be made on these newly nam ed Defendants and on the current Defendants concerning the additional claims. It is also ORDERED that those Defendants file an answer or other response as may be appropriate under Rule 12, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and the PLRA. Finally, Rodriguezs remaining claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 1/25/2018. (tlh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
