Williams v. MACON-BIBB COUNTY et al
DEVAN WILLIAMS |
ALLEN KENDRICK, MACON BIBB COUNTY, MICHAEL KENIREY, JOHN DOES, XYZ CORPORATION and OMAR SANDERS |
5:2017cv00267 |
July 13, 2017 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
Macon Office |
Bibb |
C ASHLEY ROYAL |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by ALLEN KENDRICK, MICHAEL KENIREY, MACON BIBB COUNTY, OMAR SANDERS.(LEWIS, DAWN) |
Filing 2 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to JOHN DOES, ALLEN KENDRICK, MICHAEL KENIREY, MACON BIBB COUNTY, OMAR SANDERS (ans) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against All Plaintiffs Fee paid: Receipt # 113G-2663636, $400 filed by Michael Kenirey, Allen Kendrick, MACON-BIBB COUNTY, Omar Sanders (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Copy of Record from Superior Court of Bibb County, #2 Exhibit Copy of Notice of Filing Notice of Removal filed in Superior Court of Bibb County)(LEWIS, DAWN) |
NOTICE TO COUNSEL MAHDI ABDUR-RAHMAN, JONATHAN M BRODERICK, AMBER H REED - Counsel is notified that they do not show in the court records that they meet the required attorney admissions policies of this court. If within 14 days of this notice all requirements, including the payment of admissions fees, have not been met, a show cause hearing will be scheduled. (ans) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.