KNOWLAND v. THE KROGER COMPANY
| WESLEY SCOTT KNOWLAND |
| THE KROGER COMPANY and JOHN DOES |
| 5:2017cv00472 |
| December 4, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Macon Office |
| Bibb |
| MARC THOMAS TREADWELL |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to WESLEY SCOTT KNOWLAND (ggs) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against WESLEY SCOTT KNOWLAND Fee paid: Receipt # 113G-2761222, $400 filed by KROGER CO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Responses to Defendant's First Request for Admissions, #3 Exhibit State Court Pleadings,:Complaint, Summons, Sheriff's Entry of Service, Answer )(MOFFETT, MATTHEW) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Notice of Removal, filed by THE KROGER COMPANY); Pursuant to Local Rule 87, all nongovernmental corporate parties must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement - Please file the required corporate disclosures immediately. (ggs) |
| NOTICE TO COUNSEL NICHOLAS D BEDFORD - Counsel is notified that they do not show in the court records that they meet the required attorney admissions policies of this court. If within 14 days of this notice all requirements, including the payment of Pro Hac Vice or admissions fees, have not been met, a show cause hearing will be scheduled. (ggs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
