Cooper-HIll v. HANCOCK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONER et al
| Aretha Cooper-HIll |
| HANCOCK COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND REGISTRATION, KATHY RANSOM, NANCY STEPHENS and HANCOCK COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONER |
| 5:2018cv00023 |
| January 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Macon Office |
| Hancock |
| MARC THOMAS TREADWELL |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SECOND MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Aretha Cooper-HIll filed by LATOYA A HUTCHINSON. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter Aretha Cooper-Hill Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Hancock County Board of Commissioners, #3 Summons Hancock County Board of Elections and Registration, #4 Summons Nancy Stephens, #5 Summons Kathy Ransom)(HUTCHINSON, LATOYA) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Aretha Cooper-HIll filed by LATOYA A HUTCHINSON. (Attachments: #1 Summons Hancock County Board of Commissioners, #2 Summons Hancock County Board of Elections and Registration, #3 Summons Nancy Stephens, #4 Summons Kathy Ransom)(HUTCHINSON, LATOYA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (IFP) against All Defendants filed by Aretha Cooper-HIll (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(HUTCHINSON, LATOYA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
