CROSS v. HALL et al
| DARRELL D CROSS |
| PHILLIP HALL, RODNEY MCCLOUD, WESTLEY ONEIL, SMITH, FREDRICK JOHNSON and SIGHT |
| 5:2018cv00121 |
| April 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Macon Office |
| Bibb |
| MARC THOMAS TREADWELL |
| CHARLES H WEIGLE |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER DENYING 51 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. If the Plaintiff wishes to proceed with his appeal, he must pay the entire $505 appellate filing fee. Because the Plaintiff has stated that he cannot pay the fee immediately, he must pay using the partial payment plan described under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to the custodian of the prison in which the Plaintiff is incarcerated. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 5/29/2019. (kat)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER re 46 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. The Court ORDERS the Plaintiff to supplement his motion to provide his financial information and explain his issues on appeal no later than FOURTEEN (14) days from the date of this Order. The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail the Plaintiff a copy of the standard form motion to appeal in forma pauperis that he may use for this purpose. Failure to timely comply with this Order may result in denial of the Plaintiff's Motion. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 5/1/2019. (kat)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
