TINSLEY v. STONERS PIZZA MIDDLE GA LLC
| CASEY TINSLEY |
| STONER'S PIZZA MIDDLE GA LLC and STONERS PIZZA MIDDLE GA LLC |
| 5:2018cv00250 |
| July 12, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Macon Office |
| Houston |
| MARC THOMAS TREADWELL |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to CASEY TINSLEY (vs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against STONER'S PIZZA MIDDLE GA, LLC Fee paid: Receipt # 113G-2919466, $400 filed by CASEY TINSLEY (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons to Stoner's Pizza Middle GA, LLC)(DOBSON, WILLIAM) |
| NOTICE TO COUNSEL GREGORY O WIGGINS - Counsel is notified that they do not show in the court records that they meet the required attorney admissions policies of this court. If within 14 days of this notice all requirements, including the payment of Pro Hac Vice or admissions fees, have not been met, a show cause hearing will be scheduled. (vs) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint, filed by CASEY TINSLEY ); Other: Attorney's and Defendant's information must be added to the Summons. When completed please email the Document to macon.ecf@gamd.uscourts.gov. (vs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
