CHISUM v. BEAVERS et al
Plaintiff: WILLIE QUINTAVIOUS CHISUM
Defendant: ASSISTANT WARDEN ADAMS, MAURICE BEAVERS, WARDEN MARTY ALLEN and UNIT MANAGER JACKSON
Case Number: 5:2018cv00414
Filed: November 5, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF
Referring Judge: MARC THOMAS TREADWELL
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 20, 2018 Filing 7 Acknowledgment of Electronic Case Transfer Out by District of Georgia Southern; Case Number 6:18-cv-00116. (vs)
November 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF TRANSFER transferring proceedings to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 11/20/2018. (tlh)
November 20, 2018 Case Electronically Transferred Out - District Transfer to Georgia Southern. All documents, including a certified copy of the docket sheet and pleading were transferred electronically. **The Notice of Electronic Filing serves as certification for these transferred documents.**(Case Transfer Acknowledgment deadline 12/4/2018.) (vs)
November 5, 2018 Filing 5 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to WILLIE QUINTAVIOUS CHISUM (vs)
November 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (vs)
November 5, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel Filed by WILLIE QUINTAVIOUS CHISUM. Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(vs)
November 5, 2018 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by WILLIE QUINTAVIOUS CHISUM.. Motion(s) referred to THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF.(vs)
November 5, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ADAMS, MARTY ALLEN, MAURICE BEAVERS, JACKSON,filed by WILLIE QUINTAVIOUS CHISUM. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(vs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CHISUM v. BEAVERS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ASSISTANT WARDEN ADAMS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MAURICE BEAVERS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WARDEN MARTY ALLEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNIT MANAGER JACKSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WILLIE QUINTAVIOUS CHISUM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?