ASBERRY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: SERENA RENATA ASBERRY
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Undetermined: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Case Number: 5:2018cv00418
Filed: November 6, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: TILMAN E SELF
Referring Judge: CHARLES H WEIGLE
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2018 Filing 9 USM 285 Process Receipt and Return EXECUTED for COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (ans)
November 29, 2018 Filing 8 USM 285 Process Receipt and Return MAILED for COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (ggs)
November 7, 2018 Filing 7 USM 285 Process Receipt and Return ISSUED for COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Attorney (Civil Process Clerk) (ggs)
November 7, 2018 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (ggs)
November 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Ordered by U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H. WEIGLE on 11/7/18. (aob)
November 7, 2018 Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #4 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis, filed by SERENA RENATA ASBERRY ); Wrong event used, this event is for appeals to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The correct event is "MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS" - No need to refile. (ggs)
November 6, 2018 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by SERENA RENATA ASBERRY filed by JOHN V HOGAN. (Attachments: #1 Application to file IFP, #2 Summons Atty Gen, #3 Summons Defendant, #4 Summons US Atty). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(HOGAN, JOHN)
November 6, 2018 Filing 3 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to SERENA RENATA ASBERRY (ggs)
November 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Charles H. Weigle issued at the direction of the Court. (ggs)
November 6, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (IFP) against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION filed by SERENA RENATA ASBERRY (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(HOGAN, JOHN)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ASBERRY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SERENA RENATA ASBERRY
Represented By: JOHN V HOGAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Undetermined: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?