ECKHARDT v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff: TERESA ECKHARDT
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 5:2019cv00266
Filed: June 28, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: TILMAN E SELF
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order granting Petition for Admission Pro Hac Vice (Petition Attached); Attorney Admission Fee Met by BRANT S MITTLER (nop)
July 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PETITION TO THE CLERK FOR ADMISSION TO PLEAD AND PRACTICE PRO HAC VICE by TERESA ECKHARDT Attorney Admission Fee (Pro Hac Vice) paid by Receipt # AGAMDC-3206084, $100 (MITTLER, BRANT)
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by TERESA ECKHARDT as to UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (HERRINGTON, CAROLINE)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Summons Issued to CHARLES PEELER, WILLIAM BARR, ROBERT WILKIE, and DAVID L. WHITMER as to UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(mdm)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 COMPLAINT (IFP) against All Defendants filed by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - VA Claim Denial, #2 Exhibit B - Affidavit of Robert Gish, MD, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons Charles Peeler, #5 Summons William Barr, #6 Summons Robert Wilkie, #7 Summons David Whitmer)(HERRINGTON, CAROLINE)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to TERESA ECKHARDT. (mdm)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 ***DISREGARD - FILED CORRECTLY AT #3 *** COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3198863, $400 filed by TERESA ECKHARDT (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Charles Peeler, #3 Summons William Barr, #4 Summons Robert Wilkie, #5 Summons David Whitmer)(HERRINGTON, CAROLINE) Modified on 6/28/2019 (mdm).
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order NOTICE TO COUNSEL BRANT S MITTLER - Counsel is notified that they do not show in the court records that they meet the required attorney admissions policies of this court. If within 14 days of this notice all requirements, including the payment of Pro Hac Vice or admissions fees, have not been met, a show cause hearing will be scheduled. (mdm)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint, filed by TERESA ECKHARDT ); Document must be re-filed attaching all exhibits to the complaint instead of being a part of the complaint. Each exhibit must include a description of the exhibit. When refiling the complaint, please use the event COMPLAINT IFP. (mdm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ECKHARDT v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TERESA ECKHARDT
Represented By: BRANT S MITTLER
Represented By: DONALD JAMES JORDAN
Represented By: LAUREN M CHILDS
Represented By: CAROLINE W HERRINGTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?