LOCKART v. RGL ASSOCIATES INC et al
| SUZETTE LOCKART |
| SEAN R KASPER and RGL ASSOCIATES INC |
| 5:2019cv00272 |
| July 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| MARC THOMAS TREADWELL |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER STAYING CASE: The proceedings in this case are STAYED for sixty (60) days. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 8/21/2019. (kat)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Settlement by SEAN R KASPER, RGL ASSOCIATES INC (JOINER, BLAKE) |
| Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS' ANSWER by SEAN R KASPER, RGL ASSOCIATES INC (JOINER, BLAKE) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by SUZETTE LOCKART as to SEAN R KASPER. (CARLSON, CLIFFORD) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by SUZETTE LOCKART as to RGL ASSOCIATES INC. (CARLSON, CLIFFORD) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to SEAN R KASPER, RGL ASSOCIATES INC. (Attachments: #1 Summons RGL Associates Inc. c/o Sean R. Kasper)(vs) |
| Filing 2 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to SUZETTE LOCKART (vs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3205500, $400 filed by SUZETTE LOCKART (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Statement of Claim, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons as to Sean Kasper, #4 Summons as to RGL Associates)(CARLSON, CLIFFORD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
