SHERIFF v. RECHECK FUNDING LLC et al
| AMARI SHERIFF |
| RECHECK FUNDING LLC and PHIL HARRIS |
| 5:2019cv00408 |
| October 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| TILMAN E SELF |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by AMARI SHERIFF. as to All Defendants (CARLSON, CLIFFORD) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by JOHN HENRY BEDARD, JR on behalf of PHIL HARRIS, RECHECK FUNDING LLC Attorney JOHN HENRY BEDARD, JR added to party PHIL HARRIS(pty:dft), Attorney JOHN HENRY BEDARD, JR added to party RECHECK FUNDING LLC(pty:dft) (BEDARD, JOHN) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by MICHAEL KEVIN CHAPMAN on behalf of PHIL HARRIS, RECHECK FUNDING LLC Attorney MICHAEL KEVIN CHAPMAN added to party PHIL HARRIS(pty:dft), Attorney MICHAEL KEVIN CHAPMAN added to party RECHECK FUNDING LLC(pty:dft) (CHAPMAN, MICHAEL) |
| Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to AMARI SHERIFF (ggs) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to PHIL HARRIS. (ggs) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to RECHECK FUNDING LLC. (ggs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3286550, $400 filed by AMARI SHERIFF (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons as to Recheck Funding LLC, #3 Summons as to Phil Harris)(CARLSON, CLIFFORD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
