KING v. VANCE et al
DANA KYLE KING |
DAVID YOUNG, POLICE OFFICER DEFRANCO and CYRUS R VANCE, JR |
5:2019cv00428 |
October 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
TILMAN E SELF |
CHARLES H WEIGLE |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Letter from DANA KING enclosing information pertaining to detainers, payment for copies and change of address. (Attachments: #1 Documents pertaining to detainers, #2 Envelope)(ggs) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Change of Address to Chattanooga, TN (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ggs) |
REMARK: Copy of Complaint (Doc 1) mailed to Dana King. (ggs) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Injunctive Relief Filed by DANA KYLE KING. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(ggs) |
Filing 6 Letter from G. Sellers in response re #5 Letter. (ggs) |
Filing 5 Letter requesting copy of complaint from DANA KYLE KING (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ggs) |
Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to DANA KYLE KING (vs) |
Filing 3 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (vs) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by DANA KYLE KING. Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(vs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DEFRANCO, CYRUS R VANCE, DAVID YOUNG,filed by DANA KYLE KING. (Attachments: #1 Letter from Pro Se Law Clerk, #2 Envelope)(vs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.