WOODHAM v. PRINCE PARKER ASSOCIATES INC et al
| RODNEY WOODHAM |
| DOES 1 10 INCLUSIVE and PRINCE PARKER ASSOCIATES INC |
| 5:2019cv00442 |
| November 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| TILMAN E SELF |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by RODNEY WOODHAM as to PRINCE PARKER ASSOCIATES INC. (LEMBERG, SERGEI) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by RODNEY WOODHAM (LEMBERG, SERGEI) |
| Second Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint, filed by RODNEY WOODHAM ); The Certificate of Interested Parties or Corporate Disclosure must be filed using the event Corporate Disclosure (Civil Events - Other Filings - Other Documents) (vs) |
| Filing 3 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to RODNEY WOODHAM (vs) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to PRINCE PARKER ASSOCIATES INC. (vs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DOES 1 10 INCLUSIVE, PRINCE PARKER ASSOCIATES INC Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3307047, $400 filed by RODNEY WOODHAM (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate of Interested Parties, #3 Summons)(LEMBERG, SERGEI) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint, filed by RODNEY WOODHAM ); The Certificate of Interested Parties or Corporate Disclosure must be filed using the event Corporate Disclosure (Civil Events - Other Filings - Other Documents) (vs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
