CURTIS v. MASSEE et al
NATHANIEL CURTIS, JR |
WILLIAM MASSEE and EMILY DAVIS |
5:2019cv00447 |
November 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
MARC THOMAS TREADWELL |
CHARLES H WEIGLE |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by NATHANIEL CURTIS JR. (Attachments: #1 Trust Account Statement, #2 Cover Letter) Motion referred to US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H. WEIGLE (tlf). |
Filing 10 RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER re: #8 Order by NATHANIEL CURTIS, JR (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(deb) Modified docket text on 1/7/2020 (ans). |
|
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by NATHANIEL CURTIS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(ans) |
|
Filing 5 Letter from NATHANIEL CURTIS regarding account certification (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ans) |
Filing 4 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to NATHANIEL CURTIS, JR (vs) |
|
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by NATHANIEL CURTIS, JR. Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(vs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EMILY DAVIS, WILLIAM MASSEE,filed by NATHANIEL CURTIS, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(vs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.