EL v. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES et al
| TEZ BEN EL |
| ROBYN CRITTENDEN, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES and ROBYN CRITTENDEN In her private Capacity doing business as COMMISSIONER OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES |
| 5:2020cv00231 |
| June 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| MARC THOMAS TREADWELL |
| MARC T TREADWELL |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Mail Returned - #2 Consent to Proceed Form Sent filed by TEZ BEN EL sent to TEZ BEN EL returned as undeliverable. (ggs) |
| Filing fee Paid: Habeas $5.00. Receipt Number GAM500036385. (tam) |
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT (ggs) |
Filing 5
ORDER. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee. Ordered by CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE MARC T TREADWELL on 7/10/2020. (kat)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing UCC Financing Statement Amendment by TEZ BEN EL (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ggs) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff is ORDERED to show cause, no later than July 3, 2020, why the Court should not dismiss his case for failure to pay the filing fee. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 6/21/2020. (kat)
|
| Filing 2 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to TEZ BEN EL (ggs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ROBYN CRITTENDEN, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, filed by TEZ BEN EL. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ggs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
