ASP FRANCHISING LLC v. ASCEND PROPERTY SERVICES LLC et al
| ASP Franchising, LLC and ASP FRANCHISING LLC |
| Kristian Hill, Ascend Property Services, LLC and ASCEND PROPERTY SERVICES LLC |
| 5:2020cv00400 |
| October 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| TILMAN E SELF |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
Order granting Petition for Admission Pro Hac Vice (Petition Attached); Attorney Admission Fee Met by SAMUEL A BUTLER (nop)
|
|
Filing 7
Order granting Petition for Admission Pro Hac Vice (Petition Attached); Attorney Admission Fee Met by ROBERT L ZISK (nop)
|
| Filing 6 PETITION TO THE CLERK FOR ADMISSION TO PLEAD AND PRACTICE PRO HAC VICE by ASP FRANCHISING LLC Attorney Admission Fee (Pro Hac Vice) paid by Receipt # AGAMDC-3611998, $100. LOCAL COUNSEL Name and Georgia Bar #: Lawrence B. Domenico - Bar # 003260. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(BUTLER, SAMUEL) |
| Filing 5 PETITION TO THE CLERK FOR ADMISSION TO PLEAD AND PRACTICE PRO HAC VICE by ASP FRANCHISING LLC Attorney Admission Fee (Pro Hac Vice) paid by Receipt # AGAMDC-3611985, $100. LOCAL COUNSEL Name and Georgia Bar #: Lawrence B. Domenico - Bar # 003260. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(ZISK, ROBERT) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to ASCEND PROPERTY SERVICES LLC, KRISTIAN HILL. (Attachments: #1 Summons Kristian Hill)(vs) |
| NOTICE TO COUNSEL Robert L. Zisk, SAMUEL A BUTLER - Counsel is notified that they do not show in the court records that they meet the required attorney admissions policies of this court. If within 14 days of this notice all requirements, including the payment of Pro Hac Vice or admissions fees, have not been met, a show cause hearing will be scheduled.(vs) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint, filed by ASP FRANCHISING LLC ); Notice to Counsel - LAWRENCE BRANNEN DOMENICO Your contact information in CM/ECF is not current. Please update your contact information via PACER.(vs) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint, filed by ASP FRANCHISING LLC ); Parties were added using punctuation AND/OR title capitalization. The case opening guide states ***REMINDER*** all parties must be added using ALL CAPS (ie LISA SMITH or DELTA AIRLINES). Do not use ANY punctuation when adding new parties. For instructions on adding parties, please refer to the Style Guide located on the website for the Middle District of Georgia. NO NEED TO REFILE.(vs) |
| Filing 3 REPORT filed by Lawrence Brannen Domenico (Domenico, Lawrence) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ASP Franchising, LLC identifying Corporate Parent POOL WATER HOLDINGS LLC, Corporate Parent VILLA BIDCO INC, Corporate Parent VILLA PARENT INC, Corporate Parent VILLA MIDCO INC, Corporate Parent VILLA TOPCO INC, Corporate Parent VILLA AGGREGATOR LP, Corporate Parent VILLA GP INC for ASP Franchising, LLC. (Domenico, Lawrence) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ASP Franchising, LLC Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3596266, $400 filed by ASP Franchising, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 Franchise Agreement, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 Cease & Desist, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3 Second Notice, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4 Third Notice, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons Ascend Property Services, #7 Summons Kristian Hill)(Domenico, Lawrence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
