SHIELDS v. LAUGHLIN
Petitioner: MATTHEW DONALD SHIELDS
Respondent: VANCE LAUGHLIN
Case Number: 5:2021cv00092
Filed: March 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: MARC T TREADWELL
Referring Judge: CHARLES H WEIGLE
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER for Respondent to File Responsive Pleading re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by MATTHEW DONALD SHIELDS. ORDER denying as moot #4 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 05/07/2021. (vs)
May 3, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Clerical Error by MATTHEW DONALD SHIELDS re #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(vs)
April 29, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by MATTHEW DONALD SHIELDS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(vs)
April 13, 2021 Filing fee Paid: Habeas $5.00, Receipt Number GAM500039320 (vs)
April 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that Petitioner shall have TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS from the date shown on this Order to either pay the required $5.00 filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis along with a certified copy of his trust fund account statement, including a printout of his account transactions, for the last six months. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 04/1/2021. (vs)
March 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (vs)
March 18, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS,filed by MATTHEW DONALD SHIELDS. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Exhibit A - Indictment, #3 Exhibit B - Plea, #4 Exhibit C - Motion to modify probated sentence, #5 Exhibit D - Additional special conditions of probation sex offender conditions, #6 Exhibit E - Motion for out of time Appeal, #7 Exhibit F - Motion to amend out of time Appeal, #8 Exhibit G - Order, #9 Exhibit H - Motion for leave to file an out of time Appeal, #10 Exhibit I - Order, #11 Exhibit J - Notice of Appeal, #12 Exhibit K - Letter, #13 Exhibit L - Letter, #14 Exhibit M - Motion to Compel, #15 Exhibit N - Order from the Court of Appeals, #16 Exhibit O - Letter, #17 Exhibit P - Petition for Writ of Mandamus, #18 Exhibit Q - Letter, #19 Exhibit R - Request to Proceed in forma pauperis, #20 Exhibit S - Notice of lawsuit and request for waiver of service of summons, #21 Exhibit T - Calendar Call Notice, #22 Exhibit U - Summons, #23 Exhibit V - Letter, #24 Exhibit W - Petition for Writ of Mandamus docket sheet, #25 Exhibit X - Affidavit in Support of Petition, #26 Envelope)(vs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SHIELDS v. LAUGHLIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: VANCE LAUGHLIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MATTHEW DONALD SHIELDS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?