PRADO v. LIPIN et al
DORI PRADO |
SDM TRANSPORT, INC., PRIME PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., ROMAN LIPIN, PRIME PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY INC and SDM TRANSPORT INC |
5:2021cv00128 |
April 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
TILMAN E SELF |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 SCHEDULING/DISCOVERY ORDER:Discovery to be complete by 11/17/2021. Dispositive motions due by 12/17/2021. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE TILMAN E SELF, III on 5/24/2021. (ggs) |
Filing 12 Jurisdictional Statement by PRIME PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY INC (SPRINKLE, BRIAN) |
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by PRIME PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY INC identifying Other Affiliate RLI CORPORATION, Other Affiliate Prime Insurance Company, Other Affiliate Prime Holdings Insurance Services for PRIME PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY INC. (SPRINKLE, BRIAN) |
Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #10 Answer to Complaint filed by PRIME PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY INC ); Pursuant to Local Rule 87.1, all nongovernmental corporate parties must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement. Please file the required corporate disclosures immediately.(ggs) |
Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #10 Answer to Complaint filed by PRIME PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY INC ); Pursuant to Local Rule 87.2 a Jurisdictional Statement must be filed. Please note that this is a separate pleading and filing from the corporate disclosure statement. Please do not combine these two required filings into one document.(ggs) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by PRIME PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY INC with Jury Demand.(Sprinkle, Brian)Attorney Brian W. Sprinkle added to party PRIME PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY INC(pty:dft) |
Filing 9 RULES 16/26 ORDER: Proposed Scheduling/Discovery order due by 5/21/2021. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE TILMAN E SELF, III on 4/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 Required Form)(chc) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by ROMAN LIPIN, SDM TRANSPORT INC re #1 Notice of Removal, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(KALFUS, SHAWN) |
Filing 7 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by ROMAN LIPIN, SDM TRANSPORT INC (KALFUS, SHAWN) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Amended Complaint by ROMAN LIPIN, SDM TRANSPORT INC with Jury Demand.(KALFUS, SHAWN) Modified on 4/20/2021 to add text. (ggs). |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by ROMAN LIPIN, SDM TRANSPORT INC with Jury Demand.(KALFUS, SHAWN) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SDM TRANSPORT INC (KALFUS, SHAWN) |
Filing 3 Jurisdictional Statement by ROMAN LIPIN, SDM TRANSPORT INC (KALFUS, SHAWN) |
Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Notice of Removal, filed by ROMAN LIPIN, SDM TRANSPORT, INC. ); Parties were added using punctuation AND/OR title capitalization. The case opening guide states ***REMINDER*** all parties must be added using ALL CAPS (ie LISA SMITH or DELTA AIRLINES). Do not use ANY punctuation when adding new parties. For instructions on adding parties, please refer to the Style Guide located on the website for the Middle District of Georgia. NO NEED TO REFILE, corrected by case manager.(ggs) |
Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Notice of Removal, filed by ROMAN LIPIN, SDM TRANSPORT INC, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by ROMAN LIPIN, SDM TRANSPORT INC ); The signature block does not include the e-mail address of filer as required by page 7 of the CM/ECF procedures manual. NO NEED TO REFILE- for future reference only that the filer's e-mail address must be included in the signature block.(ggs) |
Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Notice of Removal, filed by ROMAN LIPIN, SDM TRANSPORT INC ); Pursuant to Local Rule 87.2 a Jurisdictional Statement must be filed. Please file a separate statement for each corporate party.(ggs) |
Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by ROMAN LIPIN, SDM TRANSPORT INC ); Pursuant to MDGA Local Rule 87.1, all nongovernmental corporate parties must file a Corporate Disclosure Statement. This document appears to comply with NDGA Local Rules. Document must be re-filed to add corporate parents, subsidiary corporations and/or any publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of its stock to the case, during the filing process in CM/ECF. It is not sufficient to simply have them listed on the document attached, they must also be entered into CM/ECF. During the filing process, the following user message appeared: "Corporate disclosure statement must be filed with ALL corporate parents and subsidiary corporations added during the filing of the document. Additionally, any publicly held corporation that owns 10% or more of its stock must likewise be added. Failure to add the corporate parents and/or any publicly held corporation identified in your corporate disclosure statement will result in a request to re-file.". Please file the required corporate disclosures in compliance with the MDGA Local Rules immediately.(ggs) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ROMAN LIPIN, SDM TRANSPORT, INC. (KALFUS, SHAWN) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL against DORI PRADO Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3772103, $402 filed by SDM TRANSPORT, INC., ROMAN LIPIN (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Filings in state court, #2 Exhibit Communication regarding damages cap, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover)(KALFUS, SHAWN) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.