FARR et al v. HEDGEJET LLC et al
| CHANNING WILLIAMS and JAMES R FARR |
| EDWARD C NAPERSKI, JR and HEDGEJET LLC |
| 5:2021cv00191 |
| June 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| TILMAN E SELF |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Letter regarding Application for Writs of Execution re #8 Default Judgment, #7 Default Judgment (Attachments: #1 Required Form Writ of Execution - James Farr, #2 Required Form Writ of Execution - Channing Williams)(FOX, JOHN) |
| Filing 8 DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of JAMES R FARR against HEDGEJET LLC, EDWARD C NAPERSKI, JR (ggs) |
| Filing 7 DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of CHANNING WILLIAMS against HEDGEJET LLC, EDWARD C. NAPERSKI, JR. (ggs) Modified on 7/15/2021 to edit text. (ggs). |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Default Judgment as to All Defendants for a Sum Certain. by JAMES R FARR, CHANNING WILLIAMS filed by JOHN P FOX. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 - Declaration of James Farr, #2 Exhibit Ex. 2 - Declaration of Channing Williams, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Judgment for James Farr, #4 Proposed Order Proposed Judgment for Channing Williams)(FOX, JOHN) |
| CLERK'S ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to HEDGEJET LLC, EDWARD C NAPERSKI, JR - Plaintiff shall file a motion for default judgment within 21 days. The motion for default judgment shall state whether a hearing is necessary to determine damages, and if a hearing is not necessary, the motion shall include all evidence supporting the damages sought in the motion and a proposed order granting the motion. Failure to comply with this notice may result in this action being dismissed for failure to prosecute. (ggs) |
| Filing 5 Application to Clerk for Entry of Default against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Default)(FOX, JOHN) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED as to HEDGEJET LLC and EDWARD C NAPERSKI JR by JAMES R FARR, CHANNING WILLIAMS re #3 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint, #2 Summons Issued (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit of Service - Hedgejet, LLC, #2 Exhibit Affidavit of Service - Edward C. Naperski, Jr.)(FOX, JOHN) Modified on 6/11/2021 to correct event. (ggs). |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #4 Certificate of Service, filed by CHANNING WILLIAMS, JAMES R FARR ); Wrong event used the correct event is "SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED". NO NEED TO REFILE, corrected by case manager.(ggs) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Edward C Naperski, Jr. (ggs) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Hedgejet, LLC. (ggs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-3816191, $402 filed by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Farr Contract, #2 Exhibit Williams Contract, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons Hedgejet, LLC, #5 Summons Edward C. Naperski, Jr.)(FOX, JOHN) |
| Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #1 Complaint, filed by Channing Williams, James R Farr ); Parties were added using punctuation AND/OR title capitalization. The case opening guide states ***REMINDER*** all parties must be added using ALL CAPS (ie LISA SMITH or DELTA AIRLINES). Do not use ANY punctuation when adding new parties. For instructions on adding parties, please refer to the Style Guide located on the website for the Middle District of Georgia. NO NEED TO REFILE.(ggs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
