CHARLESTON v. GARY et al
Plaintiff: RODRIQUEZ CHARLESTON
Defendant: CAPTAIN JOHN GARY, NURSE BETTY, OFFICER TURNER and OFFICER MULLIS
Case Number: 5:2021cv00442
Filed: December 16, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: MARC T TREADWELL
Referring Judge: CHARLES H WEIGLE
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 02/10/2022. (vs)
January 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER for Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or submit a motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, ORDER to Recast Complaint. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 1/10/2022. (rlw)
December 29, 2021 Filing 3 ***DISREGARD***ORDER Plaintiff must immediately provide Defendant with the documents at issue. In order to ensure Plaintiffs compliance, Defendant may formally file a Motion to Compel. Defendant may also notice a deposition and require Plaintiffs attendance. If Plaintiff does not provide the documents, sit her deposition, or otherwise continue to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, then she runs the risk of having her case dismissed for failing to comply with the Courts orders. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE TILMAN E SELF, III on 12/29/2021. (vs) Modified on 12/29/2021 to add docket text(vs).
December 29, 2021 Notice of Deficiency (related document(s): #3 Order,, ); Case Administrator Deficiency. Filed in the wrong case.(vs)
December 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (tam)
December 16, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by RODRIQUEZ CHARLESTON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CHARLESTON v. GARY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RODRIQUEZ CHARLESTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CAPTAIN JOHN GARY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NURSE BETTY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OFFICER TURNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OFFICER MULLIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?