HIGH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff: NASHONDA LENEISE HIGH
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Not Classified By Court: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE) and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Case Number: 5:2022cv00122
Filed: March 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: TILMAN E SELF
Referring Judge: CHARLES H WEIGLE
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2022 Filing 8 This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The time for filing the electronic certified administrative record and answer to Plaintiff's complaint is extended through and including 6/17/2022. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 5/16/2022 (dnl)
May 16, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY filed by KEVIN D ABERNETHY.. Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(ABERNETHY, KEVIN)
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 3/22/2022 (dnl)
March 22, 2022 Filing 5 Consent Form (28 USC 636(c)(1)) sent to NASHONDA LENEISE HIGH (tam)
March 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (tam)
March 22, 2022 Filing 3 Local Rule 9.2 Social Security Identification Form by NASHONDA LENEISE HIGH (tam)
March 22, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by NASHONDA LENEISE HIGH.. Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(tam)
March 22, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, filed by NASHONDA LENEISE HIGH. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Medical Records/ Notice of Appeals Council Action)(tam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HIGH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NASHONDA LENEISE HIGH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Represented By: KEVIN D ABERNETHY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not classified by court: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (NOTICE)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?