WALSH v. AMF COMPANIES LLC
Defendant: AMF COMPANIES LLC doing business as AMF CONSTRUCTION
Petitioner: MARTIN J WALSH
Case Number: 5:2022cv00181
Filed: May 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Presiding Judge: MARC T TREADWELL
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Enforcement of Administrative Subpoena
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AMF COMPANIES LLC filed by MARTIN J WALSH (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Petition, #2 Declaration, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons)(TAG, JENNIFER)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WALSH v. AMF COMPANIES LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MARTIN J WALSH
Represented By: JENNIFER M TAG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AMF COMPANIES LLC doing business as AMF CONSTRUCTION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?