PEREZ v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
| RAMON PEREZ |
| GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN BERRY, LIEUTENANT FOSTER, WHIMPPLE, KELLY D LINDSEY, HAROLD TATE, RANJIV SAINI, DOCTOR EKININIFE, DOCTOR STEVEN NIERGARTH, KIRSTEN OWENS and KIRSTIE MURNER |
| 5:2022cv00364 |
| October 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| MARC T TREADWELL |
| CHARLES H WEIGLE |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing fee Paid: Initial Partial Filing Fee $50.85; Receipt Number: 500000965 (tam)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 11/28/2022. (vs)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is Ordered to pay an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $30.85. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 10/17/2022 (vs)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (vs)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by RAMON PEREZ.Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(vs)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants,filed by RAMON PEREZ. (Attachments: #1 Medical Record, #2 Reviewing Medical Records, #3 Insurance correct name, #4 Envelope)(vs)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
