TUCKER v. WHITTINGTON et al
| CHARLES F TUCKER and CHARLES FREDERICK TUCKER |
| WARDEN LAWRENCE WHITTINGTON and WILCOX STATE PRISON |
| 5:2022cv00423 |
| November 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| TILMAN E SELF |
| CHARLES H WEIGLE |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tlp) Modified on 1/20/2023 (tlp) - to add: Georgia DOC confirmed Plaintiff is currently incarcerated in Coffee Correctional Facility. |
| Filing fee Paid: Initial Partial Filing Fee $350.00; Receipt Number 500001431. (vs) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is Ordered to pay an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $22.50. Ordered by US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE on 1/11/2023 (tam)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge issued at the direction of the Court. (tam)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Filed by CHARLES F TUCKER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). Motion(s) referred to CHARLES H WEIGLE.(tam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by CHARLES F TUCKER. (Attachments: #1 Additional Complaint, #2 Envelope)(tam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
