AHMED v. GARLAND et al
| YEHIA AHMED REDA M AHMED |
| MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR JADDOU and JOHN AND OR JANE DOE |
| 5:2023cv00094 |
| March 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| TILMAN E SELF |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by YEHIA AHMED REDA M AHMED as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service- Mrs. Bowen Shoemaker, #2 Proof of Service- Manager of USCIS Charleston, #3 Proof of Service- Mrs. Ur Jaddou, #4 Proof of Service- Mr. Merrick Garland)(elp) |
| Filing 3 Letter regarding service of the complaint from E. Bowen Reichert Shoemaker, AUSA Chief, Civil Division (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(vs) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons for Alejandro Mayorkas, #2 Summons for Ur Jaddou, #3 Summons for Manager of Charleston S.C. USCIS, #4 Summons for Peter Leary)(elp) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS. (elp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing Fee $ 402, Receipt Number 43096, filed by YEHIA AHMED REDA M AHMED. (Attachments: #1 List of Parties, #2 Statement of Claim, #3 Relief, #4 Notice of Action, #5 Notice of Action, #6 Naturalization Interview Results, #7 Certification of Baptism).(elp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
