CHAUDHARY v. MAYORKAS et al
| SOHANKUMAR R CHAUDHARY |
| ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DANIEL RENAUD, TRACY RENAUD and MERRICK GARLAND |
| 5:2023cv00440 |
| November 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| MARC T TREADWELL |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, DANIEL RENAUD, TRACY RENAUD, U.S. Attorney (Civil Process Clerk) and U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Summons TRACY RENAUD, #2 Summons DANIEL M RENAUD, #3 Summons US ATTORNEY GENERAL, #4 Summons US ATTORNEY (CIVIL PROCESS CLERK))(ggs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Fee paid: Receipt # AGAMDC-4495500, $402 filed by All Plaintiffs (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summon- Alejandro Mayorkas, #3 Summons Summon- Merrick Garland, #4 Summons Summon- Daniel Renaud, #5 Summons Summon- Tracy Renaud, #6 Summons Summon- US Attorney MDGA Civil Process Clerk, #7 Exhibit Exhibit A- I-918 Receipt Notice, #8 Exhibit Exhibit B- USCIS Policy, #9 Exhibit Exhibit C- I-765 Receipt Notice, #10 Exhibit Exhibit D- Biometrics Notice)(CHAUDHARY, BHAVYA) |
| US MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE no longer assigned to case. (ggs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
